“Men feel the pressures of society just as much as women. Through my internet searches I have come across nothing that encourages body positivity in men. This needs to change.”
It seems a lot of you had different opinions in regards to my most recent post on male body positivity. A lot of you completely missed the point I was getting at, while a lot of you welcomed what I had said.
The main aim of the post was to bring about a topic that, believe it or not, actually exists in our society. Women are crushed by the pressures of society to be thin, beautiful, sexy, supermodel-esque and successful, we are constantly being force fed images of photoshopped beauties and stories on how to lose five kilos in three days, how to change our bodies to the way “they” think we should look rather than to learn to love ourselves just the way we are.
Now, I have to say that since the Body Love Movement has taken hold, a lot more people are aware that seeing “perfect” images of women is doing more harm than good for many women and girls, although, we still see body shaming glossy magazines and unrealistic expectations of how we should look.
Now, onto the men;
Some of you seem to think that men feel absolutely no pressure within our society, how they live in this perfect world where everything is just froth and bubbles for them and they have not a single issue in the world.
Well. You’re wrong.
You don’t think they get picked on at school for being chubby? Or teased because of their height?
Advertisements depicting men often show the typical “Hunky Adonis”. You know the guys, tanned skin, deep, dark eyes, carelessly messy hair, chiseled abs, almost completely hairless, and extremely well endowed.
You don’t suppose young boys see these advertisements and think that this is the way to be strong, sexy, successful, the epitome of a “real man”?
Isn’t it terrible when you hear about a young girl suffering from an eating disorder because she wants to look like Kate Moss? Of course it is. It’s equally as terrible to hear that a young boy has developed the same eating disorder because he wants to look like David Beckham.
Men deserve the same amount of respect and dignity in regards to their bodies as women do.
Men suffer body image issues too, and if you choose not to believe that, more fool you.
Society tells men they should tone up and get buff, apparently women don’t like like a chubby or a thin guy. Their penis size comes under scrutiny because for some reason that matters when comes to attracting a woman. It shouldn’t.
They need to appear well kept and sharp, not to be a slob.
Women feel bad when they see men oggling a stunning woman with an amazing figure, don’t you think men feel pretty bad when they see women drooling over Calvin Klein models?
Us women feel insecure about our looks all the time and it’s come to be seen as natural, but for men it’s different. They are supposed to remain indifferent to how they feel about themselves, insecurities and all. They suffer, for the most part, in silence.
Tell me again how men don’t suffer pressure from society?
Little girls grow up playing with beautiful and perfect Barbie, little boys grow up playing with G.I Joe, Action Man. Both of these toys serve as unrealistic ideals of the human body.
We are taught at a young age that big breasts, tiny waists and long legs are the epitome of femininity, men are taught that muscles equal strength and power.
Not all women wish to be feminine and ladylike, and not all men feel the need to be strong, masculine and powerful.
That isn’t to say that we don’t all suffer from some sort of body image issue at one point or another.
This brings me to something else I’ve noticed through my Male Body Positive Post.
A lot of people deemed the post sexist and then went on to inform me that there is no such thing as sexism towards the male gender, but it’s alright for a woman to discriminate against a man… If a man discriminated against a woman? Sexism.
I refuse to believe that sexism is a “woman only” term.
We frown on discrimination of all sorts from racial, ethnic, sexual etc but I have noticed that there is no such thing as anti discrimination towards men in general… To say that one cannot be sexist against a man is generalising him based on his gender. Isn’t that sexist? So by saying one cannot be sexist towards a man, you are actually being sexist…
I’ve said before that there are some God awful men out there (I know a few) but that is no need to generalise the whole male gender and say they are all bad human beings.
Having said that, there happen to be some pretty awful women out there too.
Women even get shorter prison sentences for committing the same crime as a man!
I refuse to believe that sexism does not exist towards men, because in my opinion it does. You may laugh or scoff, but just like all of you, I’m entitled to have my say.
As I stated on “THAT” post I have yet to find any body positive material for men online and what I have found on the daily pressures on the average are few and far between.
We all have the right to be loved and respected for who we are. It shouldn’t be a contest for which gender has it worse.
Discrimination of any form should not exist.
Love love love this Sugarpill smoky eye by Stacey. Girl’s got skills!
A little OCC Lip Tar goes a long way. And while they’re great solo, we love remixing shades to personalize your look—so we asked OCC to give us some winning recipes.
- STRUMPET (Deep Burgundy/Purple) + NSFW (True Red) = A bold take on the season’s black cherry lip look
- MEMENTO (Midtoned Plum-Pink) + HUSH (Pale, Antique Pink) = A subtly plum neutral great to pair with a smoky eye
- ANIME (Beyond Neon Pink) + GRANDMA (Rich, True Coral) = An ever-so-slightly subdued neon coral for a wild night out
despite tumblr deleting my previous post, which had reached about 8500 notes, I refuse to let him be sheltered.
MICHAEL BRUTSCH OF ARLINGTON TEXAS, EVERYONE
One of the worst “trolls” of reddit, he created subreddits such as “creepShots”, “jailbait”, “incest”, and “misogyny”, and MORE.
SEE GAWKER ARTICLE HERE.
He posts/encourages posting invasive, sexual pictures of women and UNDERAGE GIRLS.
RAISE AWARENESS AND HELP ME RUIN HIS CAREER.
By Dr. Jen Gunter
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) legislation regarding abortion does not take effect until 2014. Under the ACA, insurers who participate in health insurance exchanges will be free to offer plans with abortion services or not. Individual plans can also choose their degree of abortion coverage (life of mother/rape/incest, have broader coverage for genetic anomalies, or include elective abortion), however, no federal money can be used to pay for abortions beyond Hyde (rape/incest/life of mother). To get extra abortion coverage women will be required to pay for a separate abortion rider.
Under the ACA, each states exchange must provide one health plan that covers abortion and one plan that does not cover abortion or restricts abortion coverage to the Hyde basics. Except where they aren’t allowed to provide abortion coverage. You see, there’s a loophole. A big loophole. Under the ACA the states are allowed to pass laws that completely prohibit abortion in the insurance exchanges. This is not just some hypothetical they might pass a law, it’s happening right now.
In preparation for the great abortion onslaught that the ACA is sure to bring (remember, abortion coverage does not increase the rate of abortion) 20 states have already spent money passing laws affecting abortion coverage for their health insurance exchanges. As a result:
- 6 states limit coverage to life endangerment.
- 2 states limit coverage to life endangerment and “substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function.”
- 1 state limits coverage to life endangerment, “substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function,” rape or incest.
- 7 states limit coverage to life endangerment, rape and incest.
- 1 state limits coverage to life endangerment, rape and incest, fetal impairment and “substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function.”
- 1 state limits coverage to life endangerment, rape, incest and cases of “grave long-lasting physical health damage.”
- 2 states prohibit all abortion coverage in the exchange (Tennessee and Louisiana)
The ACA does many great things for health care, for example doing away with lifetime limites and pre-existing condition clauses. I also appreciate that legislation as sweeping as the ACA will need amending over time. However, allowing states another avenue to deny women the full spectrum of reproductive health services (especially considering the ACA requires plans to offer “essential health benefits”) is wrong.
From a business standpoint, excluding abortion services does not lower the cost of insurance and we know from the Canadian model that free abortion does not increase the rate. Therefore, the ACA legislation on abortion is simply another assault on Roe via the side door offered by the States. The abortion riders are likely to be $80 or more and will require a waiting period. In Kansas they don’t expect to sell any. However selling off reproductive rights state by state, well, that’s another matter.
I’m sure that if they had put abortion into the ACA it would have never passed considering how much flack it was given by republicans already but it would have been really great if it had involved abortion and hopefully it will someday in the future. Especially considering how many states have been defunding Planned Parenthoods that don’t even do abortions, and passing other laws that make it even more difficult for a person to be in control of when they have children.